Google Play icon

Reading the Signals of the Gut

Share
Posted July 2, 2019

Millions of people take probiotics with the goal of improving their digestion, but what if those bacteria were also able to detect diseases in the gut and indicate when something is awry?

New research in mice from Harvard Medical School and the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University has created an effective, noninvasive way to quickly identify new bacterial biosensors that can recognize and report the presence of various disease triggers in the gut, helping to set the stage for a new frontier of digestive health monitoring and treatment. The paper is published in mSystems.

When E. coli bacteria are exposed to a certain biological signal, the trigger element engineered into their DNA flips the memory element into an “on” state, allowing easy identification of bacteria that “remember” the presence of the signal. Image credit: Wyss Institute at Harvard University

“Our understanding of how the human gut microbiome behaves is still in its early stages, which has hindered large-scale research into creating biosensors out of living bacteria,” said David Riglar, a former research fellow in systems biology at HMS and the Wyss who now leads a research group as a Sir Henry Dale Research Fellow at Imperial College London. “This work provides a high-throughput platform for identifying genetic elements in bacteria that respond to different signals in the gut, putting us one step closer to engineering complex signaling pathways in bacteria that allow them to detect and even treat diseases long-term.”

The new platform builds on previous work from the lab of Pamela Silver, the Elliott T. and Onie H. Adams Professor of Biochemistry and Systems Biology at HMS, that designed a genetic circuit consisting of a “memory element” derived from a virus and a synthetic “trigger element” that together can detect and record the presence of a given stimulus—originally, a deactivated version of the antibiotic tetracycline.

The synthetic circuit was integrated into the genomes of E. coli bacteria, which were introduced into live mice that were then given tetracycline. The antibiotic caused the trigger element in the bacterial circuit to activate the memory element, which flipped like a switch that remained “on” for up to a week so that the bacteria “remembered” the presence of the tetracycline. The on signal was then easily read by noninvasively analyzing the animals’ excrement.

The team next demonstrated that the circuit could be tweaked to detect and report tetrathionate (a naturally occurring molecule that indicates the presence of inflammation) in the intestine of living mice for up to six months after being introduced into the animals, showing that their system could be used to monitor signals that would be useful for diagnosing disease states in the gut long-term.

But tetrathionate is just one molecule; in order to develop new bacteria-based diagnostics, the researchers needed a way to rapidly test different potential trigger elements to see if they could respond to more disease signals.

First, they modified the genetic circuit by adding an antibiotic-resistance gene that is activated when the memory element is flipped into its on state, allowing bacteria that remember a trigger to survive exposure to the antibiotic spectinomycin. To test their updated circuit against a wide variety of molecular signals, they created a library of different strains of E. coli that each contained the memory element and a unique trigger element in its genome.

This library of bacterial strains was then introduced into the guts of live mice to see if any of the trigger elements were activated by substances in the mice’s intestines. When they grew bacteria from mouse fecal samples in a medium laced with spectinomycin, they found that a number of strains grew, indicating that their memory elements had been turned on during passage through the mice. Two of the strains in particular showed consistent activation, even when given to mice in isolation, indicating that they were activated by conditions inside the mice’s gut and could serve as sensors of gut-specific signals.

The researchers repeated the experiment using a smaller library of E. coli strains whose trigger elements were genetic sequences thought to be associated with inflammation, 10 of which were activated during transit through the mice. When this library was administered to mice that had intestinal inflammation, one particular strain displayed a stronger memory response in mice with inflammation compared to healthy mice, confirming that it was able to successfully record the presence of inflammatory biomolecules in the mouse gut and thus could serve as a living monitor of gastrointestinal health.

“The beauty of this method is that it allows us to identify biosensors that already exist in nature that we wouldn’t be able to design ourselves, because so much of the function and regulation of bacterial genomes is still unknown,” said first author Alexander Naydich, who recently completed his doctoral work in the Silver lab. “We’re really taking advantage of the incredible genetic diversity of the microbiome to home in on potential solutions quickly and effectively.”

Additional features of the system include the ability to record signals that occur either chronically or transiently in the gut, as well as adjustable sensitivity in the form of synthetic ribosome-binding site sequences engineered into the trigger elements that can control the rate at which the promoters can induce an on memory state in response to a signal. These capabilities allow for the fine-tuning of bacterial biosensors to detect specific conditions within the gut over a long time span.

“We have been able to advance this technology from a tool that tests for one thing to a tool that can test for multiple things concurrently, which is not only useful for identifying new potential biosensors but could one day be developed into a probiotic-like pill containing sophisticated collections of bacteria that sense and record several signals at once, allowing clinicians to ‘fingerprint’ a disease and have greater confidence in making a diagnosis,” said Silver, who is a founding core faculty member at the Wyss.

“The continuing advances made by the Silver team in the development of living cellular devices based on the genetic reengineering of the microbiome represents an entirely new approach to low-cost diagnostics. This approach has the potential to radically transform how we interact with and control biological systems, including our own bodies,” said Donald Ingber, founding director of the Wyss, the HMS Judah Folkman Professor of Vascular Biology in the Department of Surgery at Boston Children’s Hospital, and professor of bioengineering at the Harvard John A. Paulson School of Engineering and Applied Sciences.

Source: HMS

Featured news from related categories:

Technology Org App
Google Play icon
83,909 science & technology articles

Most Popular Articles

  1. Efficiency of solar panels could be improved without changing them at all (September 2, 2019)
  2. Diesel is saved? Volkswagen found a way to reduce NOx emissions by 80% (September 3, 2019)
  3. The famous old Titanic is disappearing into time - a new expedition observed the corrosion (September 2, 2019)
  4. Moisturizers May Be Turning Your Skin Into "Swiss Cheese" (August 19, 2019)
  5. The Time Is Now for Precision Patient Monitoring (July 3, 2019)

Follow us

Facebook   Twitter   Pinterest   Tumblr   RSS   Newsletter via Email