Google Play icon

Names prompt distinct brain activity in preschoolers

Posted May 24, 2019

A study from Penn and CHOP found that when preschoolers with autism spectrum disorder hear their name, their neural patterns match those of their typically developing peers. The finding held regardless of whether the child’s mom or a stranger called the name.

Infants as young as 6 months old can typically recognize and respond to their own name. It’s an important skill for language development and social growth, one that children with autism spectrum disorder often struggle with.

A team from Penn and Children’s Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) wanted to understand what brain activity looks like when children from two groups—typically developing preschoolers and preschoolers with autism—hear their name.

As it turns out, children in both groups show a preference for their own name and exhibit neural patterns akin to those observed in adult brains that are experiencing similar stimuli. What’s more, this observation holds regardless of whether the child’s mom or a stranger is the one calling the name. The researchers published their findings in the journal PLOS One.

A child wearing the EEG cap participants used during trials of the study. This child is older than the study group, which ranged in age from 3 to 5 years old and skewed heavily male. Image credit: Suzanne Slattery/University of Pennsylvania

“We expected we might see differences in the brain activity, because we know an early hallmark of autism spectrum disorder is a lack of behavioral response and orienting when someone calls their name,” says Leah Wang, a doctoral student in Penn’s Psychology Department, a researcher at CHOP’s Center for Autism Research, and co-first author of the paper. “It’s not completely absent, but we know there’s diminished frequency and consistency.”

Instead, she continues, the study found that the participants with autism and those in the typically developing group showed similar brain activity in response to their own names, indicating that children in both groups differentiated their names from other sounds. This finding suggests “there might be other processes we should look into contributing to this diminished behavioral responding,” she adds.

To get a picture of the brain activity prompted by this experience, Wang and colleagues, including University of Connecticut doctoral student and co-first author Rebecca Thomas, recruited 19 typically developing 3- to 5-year-olds and 13 with autism. The experiment, which included more than 1,000 trials, included four stimuli: mom calling the child’s name, mom calling a made-up name, or a stranger calling both names. The participants, the majority of whom were male, wore an electroencephalogram (EEG) cap during each trial.

“The sounds were all randomized,” explains Thomas. “They didn’t always hear mom calling their name first, for instance. The stimuli were all mixed up. Once we collected EEG data, we went through to pinpoint the brain signals that aligned with certain stimuli.” For example, what does the electrical signal look like when the mother says the name compared with the stranger? Does this look the same or different if the child has autism spectrum disorder?

Answering these questions matters because recognizing your name can act as an important social marker of attention. “It serves as an anchor for the rest of your social development,” Thomas says. “It helps you to identify when someone is talking to you and whether you should be paying attention. You can imagine that a child who is not consistently responding to his or her name might be missing out on interactions.”

In the future, the scientists would like the ability to assess sub-groups within the broader autism spectrum disorder population, which will require a much larger sample size than the current work. They’re also interested in studying younger populations and in changing their secondary stimuli to something more relevant to the child, like a word describing a favorite toy rather than a made-up name.

For now, the researchers say they hope the work will simply encourage additional interest in studying neural activity in children with autism. “We call it ‘preliminary’ because we want to get these results out there and get research going on this topic,” says Wang, who is also part of CHOP’s Center for Autism Research. “Our study is a really nice first step.”

Source: University of Pennsylvania

Featured news from related categories:

Technology Org App
Google Play icon
84,082 science & technology articles

Most Popular Articles

  1. Efficiency of solar panels could be improved without changing them at all (September 2, 2019)
  2. Diesel is saved? Volkswagen found a way to reduce NOx emissions by 80% (September 3, 2019)
  3. The famous old Titanic is disappearing into time - a new expedition observed the corrosion (September 2, 2019)
  4. The Time Is Now for Precision Patient Monitoring (July 3, 2019)
  5. Europe and US are Going to Try and Deflect an Asteroid (September 6, 2019)

Follow us

Facebook   Twitter   Pinterest   Tumblr   RSS   Newsletter via Email