That appears to be possible with atom-thick materials, as demonstrated by several labs. Now, Rice University scientists have developed an understanding of the mechanism by which two-dimensional materials can be manipulated to produce the desired photons.
The Rice lab of materials theorist Boris Yakobson reported this month that by adding pre-arranged imperfections to atom-thick materials like molybdenum disulfide, they become perfectly capable of emitting single photons in either left or right polarization on demand.
The photons come from designer defects in the 2D lattice that add their own peculiar electronic properties to semiconducting materials. In the case of molybdenum disulfide – their best candidate so far – a dash of rhenium in just the right spot makes a configuration of atoms with energy states that sit comfortably inside and are isolated from the material’s natural band gap.
Once in place, the magnetic moments of atoms in the defect can be aligned with a polarized magnet. Exciting them with light brings them to a higher energetic state, but the band gap is large enough that the energy has only one way to go: out, as a coveted single photon.
“Atoms that make up the defect have magnetic moments that can be random, but a magnetic field can bring them to a particular quantum state, either up or down,” Yakobson said. “After that, if you shine light on the defect, it goes from its ground state to an excited state and emits a desirable single photon, with specific polarization. That makes it a bit, which will be useful in quantum information processing.”
“The defect’s optical transition lies in the optical fiber telecommunication band, which is ideal for integration into photonic circuits,” added Rice graduate student and lead author Sunny Gupta.
All of the 2D candidates modeled by Yakobson, Gupta and alumnus Ji-Hui Yang are dichalcogenides, semiconductors that incorporate transition metals and chalcogens. They also modeled tungsten diselenide, zirconium disulfide, boron nitride, tungsten disufide, diamane (2D diamond, which labs are beginning to synthesize) and, for comparison, 3D diamond.
“One of the advantages we argue here relative to 3D materials is that extraction of the photon is much easier, because the material is basically transparent and there is so little thickness,” Yakobson said. “Photons are not so easy to extract from 3D materials, because they may get stopped by internal reflections, or be refracted, or just dissipate in the material. But 2D materials are more open and the photon is produced near the surface, making its extraction for utility easier.”
Where that photon goes, nobody knows just yet. “We know the material can produce a photon of well-defined polarization and energy, and we suspect for good reasons that its direction is also well-defined, yet only probabilistically,” Yakobson said. “But we don’t want to go too far with the theories before somebody tries to make it in the lab.”
Source: Rice University